When High Engagement Masks Workplace Toxicity: The Moderating Role of Empathetic Leadership

Afif Farihin; Fariz Fariz

doi:10.59261/inkubis.v8i4.478

Authors

Afif Farihin Universitas Telkom
Fariz Univesitas Telkom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/inkubis.v8i4.478

Keywords:

Toxic Workplace Environment, Employee Engagement, Empathetic Leadership, False Positive Engagement, PLS-SEM

Abstract

Background: This study introduces the concept of false positive engagement.

Objective: This study examines the relationship between toxic workplace environment and employee engagement, as well as the buffering role of empathetic leadership in a high-risk state-owned energy construction sector in Indonesia. Despite increasing aggregate employee engagement scores, several engagement drivers such as work-life balance, communication, and recognition showed declining trends, indicating a potential false positive engagement phenomenon.

Methods: Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 181 employees of PT XYZ through an online questionnaire survey. The study employed Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed hypotheses and moderation model.

Results: The findings reveal that toxic workplace environment significantly reduces employee engagement (β = -0.195; p = 0.001). Furthermore, empathetic leadership significantly weakens the negative effect of toxic workplace conditions on employee engagement (β = -0.122; p = 0.038).

Conclusion: The study contributes to the organizational behavior and leadership literature by introducing the concept of false positive engagement and highlighting the importance of empathetic leadership as a psychological buffering mechanism in high-pressure project-based organizations. Practically, the findings suggest that organizations should not rely solely on aggregate engagement indices when evaluating workforce well-being and organizational health.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, Y. K., Maratis, J., Nawangsari, L. C., Putri, R. K., & Purwanto, S. K. (2024). The effect of green human resource management practices on sustainable university performance through green psychological climate. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2375404

Davis, A. S., & Van der Heijden, B. I. (2024). Too-much-of-a-good-thing? Is employee engagement always constructive and disengagement always destructive?. Management Decision, 62(6), 1950-1976.

Gallup. (2024). Gallup Q12 meta-analysis report. Gallup Press. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/321725/gallup-q12-meta-analysis-report.aspx

Gentry, W. A., Weber, T. J., & Sadri, G. (2007). Empathy in the workplace: A tool for effective leadership. Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial Organizational Psychology, New York, NY, (April).

Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382.

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Ibrahim, N. F. (2020). Relationship Between Well-Being Perspectives, Employee Engagement And Intrinsic Outcomes: A Literature Review. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.12.11

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/256287

Kock, N., Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., Sexton, S., & De La Garza, L. M. (2019). Empathetic Leadership: How Leader Emotional Support and Understanding Influences Follower Performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818806290

Kumar Guntuku, R., Boini, S., Mary, D., & Shankara Kummeta, D. (2021). impact of empathetic leadership behaviour on organizational outcomes: reference to global political leaders and companies during covid times. In Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) (Vol. 12, Number 10).

Kusy, Mitchell., & Holloway, E. (2009). Toxic workplace! Managing Toxic Personalities and Their Systems of Power. In jossey-Bass.

Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Tang, M., Saeed, A., & Iqbal, J. (2021). How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052294

Richardsen, A. M. (2019). Work engagement: Increasing employee well-being and organizational effectiveness. In Creating Psychologically Healthy Workplaces. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113427.00025

Saepudin, N. L., & Sary, F. P. (2023). Employee Engagement: How Toxic Workplace Environment and Job Burnout as a Mediation Variable Influence It? https://doi.org/10.46254/eu05.20220463

Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034

Sary, F. P., Dudija, N., & Moslem, M. (2023). Do digital competency and self-leadership influence teachers’ innovative work behavior? European Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 1449–1463. https://www.eu-jer.com/do-digital-competency-and-self-leadership-influence-teachers-innovative-work-behavior

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248

Singha, R., & Singha, S. (2024). Positive interventions at work enhancing employee well-being and organizational sustainability. In Fostering Organizational Sustainability With Positive Psychology.

Tastan, S. B. (2017). Toxic Workplace Environment In Search for the Toxic Behaviours in Organizations with a Research in Healthcare Sector. Postmodern Openings, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18662/po/2017.0801.07