TPACK Readiness, Innovative Learning Design, and Digital Entrepreneurship Skills among Indonesian Business Education Students

Dian H. Utama; S. Sulastri; Girang Razati; Ratu Dintha IZFS

doi:10.59261/inkubis.v8i4.468

Authors

Dian H. Utama Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
S. Sulastri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Girang Razati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Ratu Dintha IZFS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/inkubis.v8i4.468

Keywords:

TPACK, Innovative Learning Design, Digital Entrepreneurship, Business Education, Structural Equation Modeling, Hypothesis Testing

Abstract

Background: Digital entrepreneurship skills are increasingly important for business graduates, but evidence remains limited on how technology-integrated pedagogy is associated with their development.

Objective: This study examined the structural associations among TPACK readiness, Innovative Learning Design, and the latent construct Digital Entrepreneurship Skills, including whether Innovative Learning Design carried a significant indirect association.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling. Of 119 responses, two cases met the prespecified extreme-score rule and were excluded, producing an analytic sample of 117 students. Nineteen dimension-level indicators represented the three constructs.

Results: The retained measurement model produced standardized loadings of 0.459-0.812 and composite reliability of 0.738-0.863. Model fit improved after two theoretically justified within-construct residual correlations but remained below conventional benchmarks: chi-square (114) = 308.66, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.808; TLI = 0.771; and RMSEA = 0.121. The three direct paths were significant: TPACK-Innovative Learning Design (beta = 0.861, p < 0.001), Innovative Learning Design-Digital Entrepreneurship Skills (beta = 0.451, p = 0.044), and TPACK-Digital Entrepreneurship Skills (beta = 0.464, p = 0.048). The indirect effect was not significant (beta = 0.388, p = 0.063).

Conclusion: The findings support significant cross-sectional associations among the constructs but do not support the proposed mediation hypothesis. Interpretation should remain cautious because of suboptimal model fit, the single-institution sample, and the cross-sectional, self-report design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abaddi, S. (2024). Digital skills and entrepreneurial intentions for final-year undergraduates: Entrepreneurship education as a moderator and entrepreneurial alertness as a mediator. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(3), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-06-2023-0028

Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ramirez-Arellano, A. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), Artikel 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Ait Ali, D., El Meniari, A., El Filali, S., Morabite, O., & Senhaji, F. (2023). Empirical research on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework in health professions education: A literature review. Medical Science Educator, 33(3), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01786-z

Akram, H., Yang, Y., Ahmad, N., & Aslam, S. (2022). Factors contributing to acceptance of online education: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211050404

Akram, H., Yingxiu, Y., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Technology integration in higher education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through technological pedagogical content knowledge model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 736522.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Bachmann, N., Rose, R., Maul, V., & Hölzle, K. (2024). What makes for future entrepreneurs? The role of digital competencies for entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Business Research, 171, Artikel 114408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114408

Balsmeier, B., & Woerter, M. (2019). Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction. Research Policy, 48(8), Artikel 103765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.010

Biedma-Ferrer, J. M., Cuadros-Rodríguez, A., & Ruiz-Bejarano, A. M. (2024). Entrepreneurial education in universities: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20, 389–422.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer Science+Business Media.

Durff, L., & Carter, M. (2019). Overcoming second-order barriers to technology integration in K-5 schools. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.18

Fauziah, I. F., Suyanto, E., & Surbakti, A. (2024). The integration of 21st century skills in the curriculum of education. Heliyon, 10(16), Artikel e35548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35548

Google, Temasek, & Bain & Company. (2022). e-Conomy SEA 2022: Through the waves, towards a sea of opportunity. https://www.temasek.com.sg/content/dam/temasek-corporate/news-and-views/resources/reports/e_Conomy_SEA_2022_report.pdf

Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x

Hayani, S. N., & Sutama, S. (2022). Pengembangan perangkat dan model pembelajaran berbasis TPACK terhadap kualitas pembelajaran daring. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2871–2882. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2512

Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, M. J., Chang, Y. H., & Liang, J. C. (2022). Research on Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Education, 7, Artikel 765233. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.765233

Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2019). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.947

Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM. (2023). Laporan kinerja Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM tahun 2023.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Kurnianto, B., & Sarwono, R. (2023). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis TPACK dalam meningkatkan aktivitas belajar dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 13(3), 210–221.

Lamrabet, O., El Janati, I. I., & El Ghazi, S. (2021). A learning design cooperative framework to instill 21st century education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Artikel 100951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100951

Lamri, J., Barabel, M., & Meier, O. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), Artikel 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

Maor, D. (2017). Using TPACK to develop digital pedagogies: A Delphi study. Computers & Education, 117, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.004

Mirhabibi, A., Shayan, A., & Sahraei, S. (2025). Improving digital entrepreneurship readiness of business students: The moderating roles of digital mindset and digital education. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), Artikel 101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101151

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Patma, K., Matani, C. D., & Wijaya, A. H. C. (2024). Peran media sosial dalam menumbuhkan niat berwirausaha mahasiswa Universitas Cenderawasih. JUMABIS: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 8(2), 16–26.

Petko, D., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2025). TPACK in context: An updated model. Computers and Education Open, 8, Artikel 100244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100244

Radianto, W. E. D., & Wijaya, O. Y. A. (2017). Project based learning and innovation in entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(25), 129–140.

Ratten, V. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship education: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100745.

Singh, A. D., & Hassan, M. (2017). In pursuit of smart learning environments for the 21st century. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000252335

Sitaridis, I., & Kitsios, F. (2024). Digital entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2023-0053

Spector, J. M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1, Artikel 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7

Susanto, P., Hoque, M. E., Shah, N. U., Candra, A. H., Hashim, N. M. H. N., & Abdullah, N. L. (2023). Does digital entrepreneurship education matter for students' digital entrepreneurial intentions? The mediating role of entrepreneurial alertness. Cogent Education, 10(1), Artikel 2221164. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2221164

UNESCO. (2024). Education for sustainable development: What you need to know. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education/need-know

Van Damme, D., Lundie, D., & Morris, R. (2024). Mapping the landscape: A scoping review of 21st century skills literature in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, Artikel 104445.

Widaningsih, R., Irianto, D. M., & Yuniarti, Y. (2023). Pembelajaran berbasis TPACK untuk meningkatkan kemampuan numerasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian, 9(1), 9–16.

Yao, X. (2024). The impact of industry-education integration on college students' motivation to learn English under the TPACK framework. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(8), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i8.7994