Prioritizing Policy Strategies for Community Economic Resilience in Landslide-Prone Areas of Bogor Regency: A SWOT-QSPM Approach

Adinda Rizki Putri Sulistiyanto; Eka Intan Kumala Putri; Meilanie Buitenzorgy

doi:10.59261/inkubis.v8i3.456

Authors

Adinda Rizki Putri Sulistiyanto IPB University
Eka Intan Kumala Putri IPB University
Meilanie Buitenzorgy IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/inkubis.v8i3.456

Keywords:

Bogor Regency, Community Economic Resilience, Landslide Risk, Policy Prioritization, SWOT-QSPM

Abstract

Background: Landslide-prone communities in Bogor Regency face repeated economic shocks, while local policy responses remain fragmented across infrastructure, livelihood, financial, and institutional programs.

Objective: This study formulated and ranked policy strategies to strengthen community economic resilience in landslide-prone areas.

Methods: Evidence from 77 households in Cibedug and Bojong Koneng Villages was synthesized with in-depth assessments from five key informants representing disaster management, public works, village governments, and academia. Internal and external factors were evaluated using the Internal Factor Analysis Summary (IFAS) and External Factor Analysis Summary (EFAS), alternative strategies were generated using SWOT analysis, and priorities were ranked using the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM).

Results: The internal score was positive (strengths, 1.65; weaknesses, 1.41; coordinate, 0.24), and the external score was also positive (opportunities, 1.62; threats, 1.47; coordinate, 0.15), placing the policy system in the SO (Strengths–Opportunities)/Growth quadrant. Seven strategic alternatives were generated. Public–private partnerships for structural mitigation infrastructure ranked first, with a Sum Total Attractiveness Score (STAS) of 6.28, followed by multi-stakeholder collaboration through local institutions, with a score of 6.20, and community-based access to government programs, with a score of 6.02.

Conclusion: Policy implementation should begin with risk-reducing infrastructure, but it must also integrate local institutions, community knowledge, inclusive finance, land-tenure coordination, and staged livelihood development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press.

Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2012). Peraturan Kepala BNPB Nomor 1 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Umum Desa/Kelurahan Tangguh Bencana [Regulation of the Head of BNPB Number 1 of 2012 on General Guidelines for Disaster-Resilient Villages].

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2022). Rencana Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 2020-2044

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2025). Data Informasi Bencana Indonesia [Indonesian disaster information data].

Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Kabupaten Bogor. (2024). Data kejadian bencana Kabupaten Bogor tahun 2024 [Bogor Regency disaster event data for 2024]. (Data instansi, sah digunakan)

Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy, 26(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8

Béné, C., Newsham, A., Davies, M., Ulrichs, M., & Godfrey-Wood, R. (2014). Resilience, poverty and development. Journal of International Development, 26(5), 598–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2992

Béné, C., Wood, R. G., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. (2012). Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. IDS Working Papers, 2012(405), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013

David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2017). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts and cases (16th ed.). Pearson Education.

Devereux, S., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative social protection. IDS Bulletin, 35(3), 1–7.

Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.

Hiwasaki, L., Luna, E., Syamsidik, & Shaw, R. (2014). Process for integrating local and indigenous knowledge with science for hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in coastal and small island communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 15–27.

Jones, L., & Tanner, T. (2017). Subjective resilience: Using perceptions to quantify household resilience to climate extremes and disasters. Regional Environmental Change, 17, 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0995-2

Kusumasari, B., Alam, Q., & Siddiqui, K. (2010). Resource capability for local government in managing disaster. Disaster Prevention and Management, 19(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011070367

Mallick, S. K., Rudra, S., & Samanta, R. (2020). Sustainable ecotourism development using SWOT and QSPM approach: A study on Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 8(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.06.001

Mercer, J., Kelman, I., Taranis, L., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2010). Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Disasters, 34(1), 214–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01126.x

Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22(1), 5–34.

Patel, S. S., Rogers, M. B., Amlôt, R., & Rubin, G. J. (2017). What do we mean by community resilience? A systematic literature review of how it is defined in the literature. PLOS Currents, 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2

Pratiwi, S. F., Manessa, M. D. M., & Supriatna. (2022). Kajian dan evaluasi bencana tanah longsor di Kecamatan Tanjungsari terhadap RTRW Kabupaten Bogor [Assessment and evaluation of landslide disasters in Tanjungsari District against the Bogor Regency spatial plan]. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 10(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.10.1.86-96

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Rangkuti, F. (2016). Analisis SWOT: Teknik membedah kasus bisnis [SWOT analysis: Techniques for dissecting business cases]. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Reale, A., & Handmer, J. (2011). Land tenure, disasters and vulnerability. Disasters, 35(1), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01198.x

Riantoro, D., & Aninam, J. (2021). Analisis SWOT untuk strategi pengembangan objek wisata Hutan Bakau Kormun Wasidori Arfai di Manokwari [SWOT analysis for the development strategy of Kormun Wasidori Arfai mangrove tourism in Manokwari]. Lensa Ekonomi, 15(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.30862/lensa.v15i01.146

Speranza, C. I., Wiesmann, U., & Rist, S. (2014). An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics. Global Environmental Change, 28, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030.

Wibowo, F. G., Aini, Q. H. U., Sunardi, A. E., Layyinah, N. U., & Machdum, S. V. (2017). Identifikasi potensi, kebutuhan, dan permasalahan berdasarkan hubungan interaksi masyarakat dengan lingkungannya yang rentan terhadap bencana longsor [Identification of potential, needs, and problems based on community interaction with landslide-prone environments]. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 18(2), 95–112.