Risk Dimensions, Financial Performance, and ESG: Cross-Country Evidence from OECD and BRICS

Aditya Oktaviandry; Maria Ulpah

doi:10.59261/inkubis.v8i2.328

Authors

Aditya Oktaviandry Universitas Indonesia
Maria Ulpah Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/inkubis.v8i2.328

Keywords:

BRICS ESG Performance, Cross-Country Panel Data, ESG, External Risks, Financial Performance, Institutional Theory

Abstract

Background: The global increase in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)-based investments has not only reflected companies’ strategic commitments to sustainability but has also been shaped by regulatory pressures and cross-border institutional conditions.

Objective: This study aims to examine the influence of external and internal risks on ESG performance through the mediating role of financial performance in non-financial companies across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and BRICS countries. External risk is measured using market beta, whereas internal risk is measured through operating cash flow volatility.

Methods: This study employed a quantitative approach using fixed-effects panel data analysis of non-financial companies during the 2016–2024 period. Mediation analysis was conducted using bias-corrected bootstrap estimation, while endogeneity was addressed using the Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) approach. The final sample composition and statistical software employed are reported in the Methods section.

Results: The findings indicate that financial performance does not consistently mediate the relationship between risk and ESG performance across all cross-country subsamples. Internal and external risks demonstrate heterogeneous effects across institutional contexts, primarily due to differences in ESG regulations, financial market development, and stakeholder pressures. The mediating effect was relatively stronger among firms in OECD countries.

Conclusion: This study confirms that the relationship among risk, financial performance, and ESG performance is context-dependent and cannot be universally generalized without considering country-specific institutional characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astuti, N. D., Malau, E. I., & Bahantwelu, M. I. (2025). Model Konseptual Integrasi Akuntansi Lingkungan Ke Dalam Pelaporan Keuangan: Implikasi Bagi Akuntabilitas Dan Praktik Akuntansi Modern. JURNAL AKUNTANSI: TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITAS, 13(2), 77–85.

Bednarski, L., Subramanian, N., Roscoe, S., & Blome, C. (2026). Geopolitical rivalry over strategically important industries: understanding the effects on global supply chain design. Production Planning & Control, 37(6), 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2025.2570203

Chan, E. Y. (2026). Moral signaling in startups: how ESG claims shape stakeholder judgments and ethical legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 203(2), 297–311.

Chowdhury, M. S. R., Koussis, N., Makrominas, M., & Trigeorgis, L. (2025). Geopolitical risk, uncertainty, real options, and corporate social responsibility. Financial Review, 60(3), 729–759.

Farhan, M. (2024). Keseimbangan risiko dan imbal hasil dalam strategi investasi berkelanjutan: Pendekatan integratif terhadap faktor lingkungan, sosial, dan tata kelola perusahaan (ESG). Currency (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah), 2(2), 243–264.

Fauza, T. (2025). Analisis Komparatif Pengaruh Kinerja Dan Kontroversi Esg Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Perbandingan Perusahaan Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia. Universitas Andalas.

Fitri, S. K. (2025). Pengaruh Kinerja Environmental, Social, Governance (Esg) Terhadap Biaya Utang (Cost Of Debt) Di Indonesia Tahun 2019-2023. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Gao, S., Meng, F., Wang, W., & Chen, W. (2023). Does ESG always improve corporate performance? Evidence from firm life cycle perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1105077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1105077

Garcia, A. S., & Orsato, R. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261–3272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2570

Hidayatullah, M. W. (2025). Pengaruh Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) terhadap Cost of Equity Capital dengan Market Risk Sebagai Variabel Mediasi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Tercatat Indeks Sri-Kehati Tahun 2020-2024). UIN KH Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan.

Ihbal, A. (2024). Pengaruh Struktur Dewan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan: Peran Mediator Skor Environmental Social Governance (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Publik Pasar Berkembang Asean yang Terdaftar di Database Bloomberg Periode Tahun 2013-2019). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2023). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00579-7

Jahan, F., & Ryu, D. (2026). Corporate cash holdings under geopolitical risk: Global versus localized effects. Eurasian Business Review, 1–26.

Jihadi, M. (2026). Manajemen Keuangan Berkelanjutan: Mengintegrasikan Keuangan Dan Esg. UMMPress.

Minton, B. A., & Schrand, C. (1999). The impact of cash flow volatility on discretionary investment and the costs of debt and equity financing. Journal of Financial Economics, 54(3), 423–460.

Nurmasari, N. D., Mychelia Champaca, S. E., MM, A., & A Muhamad Jazuli, M. M. (2025). ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE (ESG) DAN KEUANGAN HIJAU Mengintegrasikan Keberlanjutan dalam Strategi Perusahaan. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.

Oktrivina, A., Atikah, S., & Sujana, A. P. (2026). Peran mediasi ESG pada hubungan kepemilikan asing dan struktur modal: Moderasi likuiditas dan ukuran perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 23(1), 57–72.

Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.

Useche, A. J., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Reyes, G. E. (2025). Taking ESG strategies for achieving profits: a dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 30(59), 61–78.

Wu, L., Shao, Z., Yang, C., Ding, T., & Zhang, W. (2020). The impact of CSR and financial distress on financial performance—evidence from Chinese listed companies of the manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 12(17), 6799.

Xu, S., Khurshid, A., Zhang, J., & Cifuentes‐Faura, J. (2026). How Networks Shape the ESG–Resilience Link: A Multi‐Level Analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 33(3), 3582–3597.