Country Risk, Financial Development, And Renewable Energy Consumption: Evidence from G20 Countries

Authors

  • Wahyu Nugroho Universitas Airlangga
  • Rossanto Dwi Handoyo Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/inkubis.v8i3.297

Keywords:

Country Risk, Financial Development, Financial Incumbency, G20, Renewable Energy Consumption

Abstract

Background:  The global energy transition toward renewable energy sources remains constrained by complex institutional, financial, and geopolitical barriers, particularly among G20 economies that collectively contribute more than 75% of global CO₂ emissions. Despite recent growth in renewable energy investment, the share of renewable energy in total final energy consumption across G20 countries remains heterogeneous and unevenly distributed, reflecting structural differences in financial system maturity, political risk environments, and fossil energy path dependencies.

Objective: This study analyzes the effects of country risk measured through the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) composite index and financial development on renewable energy consumption across 18 G20 member countries over 1992–2021 (540 observations).

Method: Employing fixed-effects panel regression as a baseline and Mean Group Estimator (MG) as the primary estimator, the study yields three key findings.

Results: First, financial development exerts a significant negative effect on renewable energy consumption (β = −4.433**), contrary to conventional expectations, confirming the dominance of the financial incumbency hypothesis in the G20 context an entrenched financial system perpetuates fossil fuel financing orientation. Second, composite risk is insignificant, confirming aggregation bias in composite risk indices that conceals individual risk dimension effects. Third, CO2 emissions exert a highly significant negative effect (β = −1.403***) as the only variable consistent across all estimations, confirming carbon lock-in as a universal barrier to energy transition.

Conclusion: The reversal of the financial development coefficient from a statistically insignificant positive estimate in OLS FE (β = 8.328, t = 1.32) to a significant negative estimate in MG (−4.433**) empirically demonstrates the aggregation bias consequences concealed in homogeneous panel estimators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3255?

Cadoret, I., & Padovano, F. (2016). The political drivers of renewable energies policies. Energy Economics, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.03.003

Campiglio, E. (2016). Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.020

Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. In Nature Climate Change (Vol. 8, Number 6). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0175-0

Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-Section Dependence in Nonstationary Panel Models: A Novel Estimator. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, (17870).

Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2011). Econometrics for grumblers: A new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00624.x

Erb, C. B., Harvey, C. R., & Viskanta, T. E. (1996). Political risk, economic risk, and financial risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 52(6). https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v52.n6.2038

Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010

Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352

Hondroyiannis, G., Papapetrou, E., & Tsalaporta, P. (2024). Sustainable energy consumption and finance in the presence of risks: Towards a green economy. Renewable Energy, 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121565

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). World energy outlook 2022. IEA Publications.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press.

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2023). World energy transitions outlook 2023. IRENA Publications.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Scaling up private finance for clean energy in emerging and developing economies. IEA Publications.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. In Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808678

Paramati, S. R., Mo, D., & Huang, R. (2021). The role of financial deepening and green technology on carbon emissions: Evidence from major OECD economies. Finance Research Letters, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101794

Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. In Econometrica (Vol. 74, Number 4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x

Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951

Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6–10). https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623

Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7

Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F

Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010

Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development, 22(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90007-8

Robertson, D., & Symons, J. (1992). Some strange properties of panel data estimators. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950070206

Shahbaz, M., Topcu, B. A., Sarıgül, S. S., & Vo, X. V. (2021). The effect of financial development on renewable energy demand: The case of developing countries. Renewable Energy, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.121

Svirydzenka, K. (2016). Introducing a New Broad-based Index of Financial Development. IMF Working Papers, 16(05). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513583709.001

Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). The Paris Agreement. United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-17