The Influence of Green Finance on Reducing Emission Intensity in Electric Utility Companies in ASEAN

Okky Aufarul Mawahib; Wisnu Wibowo

doi:10.59261/inkubis.v8i3.285

Authors

Okky Aufarul Mawahib Universitas Airlangga
Wisnu Wibowo Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/inkubis.v8i3.285

Keywords:

green finance, emission intensity, leverage, return on investment, ASEAN utilities

Abstract

Background: The decarbonization of electric utilities in ASEAN requires financing instruments that can reduce corporate carbon intensity without compromising energy security.

Objective: This study examines whether green finance reduces emission intensity and whether leverage and return on investment condition this effect.
Methods: The study uses secondary panel data from electric utility and energy companies in ASEAN during 2015–2024. Green finance is proxied by green loans and green bonds scaled by total assets and lagged by one year, while emission intensity is measured as emissions per unit of sales. The empirical model is estimated using panel regression, and model selection tests support the random-effects specification.

Results: The results show that green finance has a negative and statistically significant effect on emission intensity. The interaction between green finance and leverage is positive and significant, indicating that higher debt weakens the emission-reducing effect of green finance. Conversely, the interaction between green finance and return on investment is negative and significant, indicating that stronger investment returns enhance the effectiveness of green finance. ESG scores are also associated with lower emission intensity, while state-owned enterprises tend to exhibit higher emission intensity.

Conclusion: The findings imply that green finance is more effective when supported by a sound capital structure, adequate investment returns, and effective sustainability governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASEAN Centre for Energy. (2023). ASEAN energy database system and outlook report. Jakarta: ACE.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.

Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2011). Energy economics: Concepts, issues, markets and governance. In Energy Economics: Concepts, Issues, Markets and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-268-1

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (2023). Reprint of: Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.001

Brigham, E. F., Houston, J. F., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Fundamentals of financial management.

Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings. Accounting Review, 97(1). https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506

Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stokcholder approach. Pitman Boston, MA.

ICMA. (2021). Green bond principles. Zurich: International Capital Market Association.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

Jenson, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour. Agency Cost.

Li, B., Zhang, J., Shen, Y., & Du, Q. (2023). Can green credit policy promote green total factor productivity? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22695-5

Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0

OECD. (2023). Ownership and governance of state-owned enterprises. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504

Pigou, A. C., & Aslanbeigui, N. (2017). The Economics of Welfare. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351304368

Schoenmaker, D. and W. S. (2019). Principles of sustainable finance.

Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934

Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281–306). Elsevier.

Su, R., Shui, X., & Du, J. (2023). Institutional Pressures and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence From Chinese Public Enterprises. Organization and Environment, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231174039

Tang, D. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Do shareholders benefit from green bonds? Journal of Corporate Finance, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001

Tolliver, C., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S. (2020). Drivers of green bond market growth: The importance of Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Agreement and implications for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118643

Treepongkaruna, S., Au Yong, H. H., Thomsen, S., & Kyaw, K. (2024). Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3929

UNFCCC. (2024). Nationally determined contributions synthesis report. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Wei, P., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Corporate green bonds and carbon performance: An economic input–output life cycle assessment model-based analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3267

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Booksgooglecom, 58(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.021

World Bank. (2022). Financing climate transition in developing economies. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Yang, C., Zhu, C., & Albitar, K. (2024). ESG ratings and green innovation: A U-shaped journey towards sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3692

Zhang, T. (2023). Can green finance policies affect corporate financing? Evidence from China’s green finance innovation and reform pilot zones. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138289

Zhu, N. (2026). Strategic Pathways to Decarbonization Through ESG Innovation in High‐Pollution Industries: Synergizing Digital Transformation and Sustainable Governance for Net‐Zero Goal. Business Strategy and the Environment.